Employees Who Should Not Return to the Office – And the Cost of Forcing Them

Many companies are pushing employees back to the office, but for knowledge workers—those responsible for creating intellectual capital like data, algorithms, and IP—this could be a costly mistake. These roles, which drive the majority of enterprise value in industries like tech, pharma, and finance, are not bound by time or space, meaning rigid in-office mandates may actually hinder their productivity and innovation. Instead, organizations should identify the work most critical to future growth and apply flexible return-to-office policies accordingly. Not every role is equal in shaping a company’s value, forcing the wrong employees back could weaken long-term competitiveness. The world’s most valuable companies aren’t built on factories or real estate anymore.

Their biggest assets don’t sit on a balance sheet. Intellectual capital — e.g., data, algorithms, brands, intellectual property — is the foundation of today’s economy. And the employees responsible for creating, maintaining, and growing these assets are the ones who drive the lion’s share of enterprise value.

Yet, many organizations are still trying to force these employees back into offices under rigid, outdated schedules. The idea that knowledge workers should conform to a traditional 9-to-5 structure in a corporate office ignores a fundamental truth: the work that creates enterprise value isn’t bound by time or space. In fact, enforcing such constraints could actively diminish innovation, productivity, and long-term success.

The work that creates enterprise value isn’t bound by time or space.

The Knowledge Economy’s Most Valuable Employees

The people who build a company’s future—whether they’re research scientists in biotech, AI engineers in tech, data analysts in financial services, or brand strategists in CPG—don’t generate their best work by sitting in assigned seats under fluorescent lights for prescribed hours. Their success is tied to problem-solving, creativity, and deep thinking—activities that don’t thrive under rigid control.

Consider a research scientist who works best late at night in a specific lab setup or a machine-learning engineer who hits peak productivity between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. The traditional office structure doesn’t accommodate how they work best, and forcing them to fit outdated norms could mean suboptimal results—or losing them altogether.

The Real Cost of Forced Office Returns

If companies mandate strict return-to-office policies without considering the nature of work and the people who perform it, they risk real consequences:

• Declining Productivity: Productivity isn’t about time spent in a chair; it’s about output. Forcing top thinkers into rigid schedules may reduce the effectiveness of their work rather than improve it.

• Losing Top Talent: The highest-performing knowledge workers have options. If a company limits their flexibility, they will likely go elsewhere—often to competitors who understand the importance of autonomy.

• Innovation Stagnation: Breakthroughs come from deep, focused work, not from sitting in a specific place at a specific time. Creativity and problem-solving suffer when employees are forced into environments that don’t support how they work best.

• Erosion of Competitive Advantage: The companies that thrive in the next decade will be those that optimize how their most valuable employees operate. Those that cling to outdated work models will fall behind.

A Smarter Approach: Rethinking Who Needs to Be in the Office

Rather than blanket mandates, companies should take a strategic approach:

1. Identify the Work That Drives Enterprise Value

   • What functions and roles are directly responsible for creating and maintaining intellectual capital?

   • Which jobs require in-person collaboration, and which ones thrive on flexibility?

2. Align Work With Workplace Needs

   • Instead of forcing a one-size-fits-all return-to-office policy, allow for tailored approaches based on role, work style, and performance.

   • Encourage on-site collaboration where it adds value—brainstorming sessions, critical problem-solving meetings—but allow for remote deep work where it makes sense.

3. Recognize That Not All Roles Are Equal

   • Every employee plays a role, but not every job is directly responsible for building long-term enterprise value. The work that requires autonomy, deep thinking, and high creativity should not be constrained by artificial location requirements.

The Future of Work Is About Choice

The shift to remote and hybrid work wasn’t just a pandemic-era experiment—it was a realization that rigid office culture is obsolete for many roles. Companies that recognize this will attract and retain the brightest minds. Those that don’t will lose their competitive edge.

Forcing high-value knowledge workers back to a desk doesn’t just inconvenience them—it actively harms the company’s future. The smart play isn’t mandating where and when people work. It’s identifying the work that matters most, giving the right people the freedom to do it well, and making the office a resource, not a requirement.

Want thought partnership or more about our approach for identifying the roles that drive enterprise value in your organization? Contact us for a free consultation.

Interested in reading more about this topic? We wrote the book on it.